Understanding your options · Explainer

Why “who initiated the payment?” matters

A practical distinction that can change the reporting conversation.

U.S. consumer guidance · Reviewed October 27, 2026

Describe the sequence, not just the label

A payment you initiated after being deceived and a transfer someone else initiated with stolen access can raise different questions. Write down who operated the app, who entered the recipient, and who confirmed the transfer.

Sharing access information is not the end of the analysis

The CFPB’s Electronic Fund Transfers FAQs explain that a transfer a third party initiates using access information obtained through fraud can be unauthorized. Tell the provider if a caller tricked you into sharing a code or credentials.

Ask for an explanation

Report promptly and accurately. Ask which process applies and request the decision and its reasoning in writing. This overview does not decide whether a specific claim is covered.

Sources & further reading

Reviewed October 27, 2026. Provider terms and support routes can change.

← All research & context

Was this guide useful?

Responses stay in this tab. Send feedback →

Feedback

Feedback & corrections

Tell us what helped, what was confusing, or what needs a correction.

Only this page’s path is included. Your search terms, private codes, and tool drafts are not sent.

Write to PaymentsFraud.org

Leave out account numbers, passwords, verification codes, addresses, and other people’s identifying details. No attachments.

Read the privacy notice before sending →